Berndt Rasmussen, Katharina & Per Algander | 2019
Utilitas, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp.213-230. doi.org/10.1017/S0953820818000341
Abstract
In this article we distinguish two versions of the non-identity problem: one involving positive well-being and one involving negative well-being. Intuitively, there seems to be a difference between the two versions of the problem. In the negative case it is clear that one ought to cause the better-off person to exist. However, it has recently been suggested that this is not so in the positive case. We argue that such an asymmetrical treatment of the two versions should be rejected and that this is evidence against views according to which it is permissible to cause the less well-off person to exist in the positive non-identity case.
